Trump Reshapes Justice Department in Second Term: Safety Is Not The Priority

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

News Editor John O’Connor examines Trump’s sweeping overhaul of the U.S. Justice Department and the pivotal role Attorney General, Pam Bondi, played in clearing his path.

20 January 2025 will be remembered as a pivotal moment in the history of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). On that day, not only was Donald Trump inaugurated for a second term, but the President also issued a stark promise that signaled a dramatic shift and overhaul in the federal justice system. In his inaugural address, the President declared, “The scales of justice will be rebalanced. The vicious, violent, and unfair weaponization of the Justice Department and our government will end.” The President’s statement marked the beginning of a troubling chapter in the new unprecedentedly close relationship between the executive branch and the nation's highest legal institution.

The President seeks to reshape the Justice Department in the name of fairness and reform - he does so as a convicted felon.

Just four days after his inauguration, Trump began a sweeping purge within the federal government, ordering the immediate dismissal of 17 inspectors general, who act as oversight officials across federal agencies, to weaken the presence of independent oversight in the "revitalised" department. Trump continued his culling of top officials in the form of orchestrated transfers and dismissals of senior DOJ attorneys that may have been potentially disloyal, transferring them to the department’s outermost orbits, to positions so peripheral that they effectively amounted to a firing in everything but name. 

One of the first steps in Trump’s overhaul of the Justice Department, which would facilitate further similar unorthodox actions within the department, came in February with the announcement of his intent to appoint Pam Bondi, the former Attorney General of Florida and a key role figure in Trump’s legal defense team during his first impeachment by the US House, as Attorney General. With a longtime Trump ally at the helm, Bondi's nomination signaled a clear shift toward loyalty-driven leadership within the department. Eight months into Trump’s second term Bondi has already cleared the path for Trump to redefine American justice. If it truly was Trump’s intent to rebalance “the scales of justice”, then it is Bondi who is placing her finger on the scale, disguising this new imbalance as departmental restoration. 

If it truly was Trump’s intent to rebalance ‘the scales of justice’, then it is Bondi who is placing her finger on the scale, disguising this new imbalance as departmental restoration.

The journey for increased control came only a few days after Bondi was sworn in as Attorney General. On 18 February Trump issued Executive Order 14215, a sweeping directive which mandates that  “authoritative interpretations of law” come only from the President or Attorney General, giving the administration broad oversight over independent regulatory agencies and never before exercised control over the DOJ and its 115,000 employees. This executive order fundamentally mutates the legal landscape within the executive branch by stripping independent regulatory agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), of their decades-long ability to oversee statutory mandates independently.

The executive order also granted the DOJ, under Bondi, more influence over the interpretation and enforcement of federal law, allowing the administration to shape and dictate legal meaning in real time to align with its own Republican and conservative political objectives and ideologies. 

Only last month, on 11 August,  the President used Section 740 of the Home Rule Act to federalize the DC metro police. “We’re going to restore the city back to the gleaming capital that everybody wants it to be,” Trump said while declaring a crime emergency in the capital city, “It’s going to be something very special.” He later announced it would be Bondi who would be personally overseeing the implementation of this order. This is the first time a sitting president has used this order to federalize the DC metro police. 

What makes the order all the more unpopular is the false claim of a crime spike. Muriel Bowser, Mayor of the District of Columbia, said firmly that DC is “not experiencing a spike in crime but a decrease in crime.” Despite this, the President decided to activate 800 soldiers from the DC National Guard, with up to 200 members being assigned to supporting law enforcement. A poll from the Washington Post showed 80% of DC citizens were not happy with this decision, however top administration officials claimed the order was very popular, including the Vice President, JD Vance.

What we are seeing unfold in America, DC in particular, is unlike anything we have seen before. As of the time of publication, the President has taken it upon himself to reshape both the idea of justice and the role of the DOJ while his own administration is currently the subject of hundreds of legal actions initiated by state attorneys general, media organizations, academic institutions, medical professionals, law firms, and labor unions. 

Notably, the President himself has been convicted of 34 criminal charges, and while the President seeks to reshape the Justice Department in the name of fairness and reform, he does so as a convicted felon. His vision of the justice system is not to serve the public good, but to shield personal interest and accelerate the implementation of the administration’s agenda. These unfolding events evoke the image of Lady Justice, scales in one hand, sword in the other. Yet her blindfold now seems to have loosened, her gaze no longer impartial. The scales tilted toward the White House, while the sword, a symbol of protection and fairness, now appears turned against those it is meant to defend.